Skip to content
Corporate Finance | Part 19 of 24

Liquidity Management Starts with the Timing of Obligations

Build actionable cash forecasts, funding headroom and treasury limits around actual obligations.

An annual plan shows a positive closing cash balance while the business faces a payment gap next month. A large customer receipt arrives after a tax, payroll or supplier obligation.

Liquidity management concerns the sequence of available resources and obligations. An attractive annual result does not make that sequence safe.

Build a near-term cash view

Use a rolling forecast with enough detail to identify relevant payment and collection dates. A thirteen-week view can be useful for short-term management, with a longer horizon for structural needs.

Begin with available cash and forecast receipts and payments. Separate committed amounts from uncertain expectations.

A hypothetical project company expects a milestone payment but has not completed acceptance. The forecast should expose that condition rather than treat the receipt as certain.

Reconcile with operational evidence

Connect collections with delivery, billing readiness and customer behavior. Connect payments with purchasing, payroll, investment and other actual commitments.

Explain variances between forecast and outcome. Persistent timing errors can reveal weak information flow or optimistic assumptions.

Assign owners to important receipts and payments. Treasury should not be left to estimate operational events without relevant input.

Distinguish balances from availability

Cash may be restricted, held in a different entity or unavailable for a particular obligation. Facilities may have conditions, expiry dates or draw requirements.

A committed undrawn line and an informal indication of lender support are different resources.

Review currency, legal-entity and counterparty concentrations. A consolidated total can conceal a local payment problem.

Understand the rate basis

Cash instruments and floating debt can reference different benchmarks. €STR is an overnight euro benchmark; Euribor serves a different benchmark role and is not interchangeable with it.

The ECB publishes €STR, while ESMA’s euro-risk-free-rate materials distinguish benchmark reform and Euribor fallback work. Check the actual contract, reset convention and fallback rather than carrying forward legacy assumptions.

A benchmark rate is not the company’s complete borrowing cost.

Stress timing as well as earnings

Test delayed collection, inventory needs, funding restrictions and collateral calls. Include combinations that could occur together.

Define a minimum buffer based on the business and its response time. A universal number of cash days is unlikely to fit every operating model.

Identify the point at which management must act, with feasible options and clear authority.

Set treasury priorities explicitly

Balance security, liquidity and return according to the purpose of the funds. Resources needed for near-term obligations should not be evaluated only by yield.

Use approved limits, clear transaction authority and appropriate independent checks. Review the availability of a fallback process if a bank or system is inaccessible.

For the next liquidity review, identify the lowest expected cash point, the assumption most capable of worsening it and the action available before that point.

A useful forecast supports timely decisions and makes uncertainty visible while the business still has room to respond.

References

  1. Euro Short-Term Rate (€STR) (European Central Bank)
  2. Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (ESMA)
Newsletter

One Lean idea.
Every week.